View Single Post
      01-11-2014, 04:29 PM   #148
Jamesons Viggen
Brigadier General
United_States
195
Rep
3,780
Posts

Drives: '98 M Roadster stg 2+ S/C
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Rochester Hills MI

iTrader: (3)

You can dig as much as you want if you want to miss the point.

I went back to 2011 and my point about Mustangs vs BMWs is still true.

The Boss is faster than the M3, the V6 has been shown faster than most recent testing of the E92. That statement is 100%

If your not happy with it, go fly a kite

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kayani_1 View Post
JV, your stats for the merits of E92 335i with N54 need a bit more polishing. May I remind you that a 7 year old 2007 E92 335i posted the following times on same Lightning laps you are quoting with standard OE tires. To me it is quite impressive when it is nearly a .5 sec slower then a 500hp mighty M6 messaged by M performance division or faster then much more power full Mustang Shelby GT500 or when it puts great performance cars like RS4 and Z4 M coupe in its place all without an LSD.


50 3:10.0 BMW M6 LL3 11/06
51 3:10.5 BMW 335i COUPE LL2 8/07
52 3:10.6 MITSUBISHI LANCER EVOLUTION SE LL2 2/11
53 3:10.8 AUDI S4 LL2 2/10
54 3:11.0 FORD MUSTANG SHELBY GT500 LL2 11/06
55 3:11.0 AUDI RS4 LL3 8/07
56 3:11.7 BMW Z4 M COUPE LL2 8/07



I think if you are going to mention Lightning lap times to justify your point then be fair to the E92 platform and not cherry pick times that suit your argument. Just a suggestion for the old times sake so you can better defend F30 platform in future.

You know I could not let you slide with that one. If you are going to come at N54 335i then you will have to do better then that.....lol...
__________________

'98 Dinan/RMS stage 2+(VAC cams, CES Cutring etc)
'15 Buick Regal "T"(wife)
'06 Saab 9-5 Combi 5mt (full suspension, LSD, clipped turbo etc)
Appreciate 0