View Single Post
      09-14-2013, 11:58 AM   #2932
dcstep
Major General
United_States
1291
Rep
7,389
Posts

Drives: '09 Cpe Silverstone FR 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2009 M3  [8.40]
Quote:
Originally Posted by M_Six View Post
Been thinking the same thing. My issue with the 180mm is the reportedly slooooow AF. I'd be using it to grab pics of butterflies with the local group from our biology dept. Butterflies rarely sit still long enough to wait for a lens to focus. I'm thinking now the 100mm L macro might work better and be more versatile. Plus it has IS where the 180 does not.
I like my 70-200mm f/4L IS for its flexible focal length and short focus distance, particularly with a 25mm ET. I've also got a close up diopter filters that I can add also. The ole 500mm is fantastic, but a bear to use sometimes.

Dave
__________________
Appreciate 0