04-21-2016, 04:46 PM | #23 | |
Blocked from G80/G82 for having an opinion
3498
Rep 3,735
Posts |
Quote:
BMW has the right philosophy. Think about it. They build essentially EVs that are not dependent on having a charging network built specifically for the vehicle. Instead the i3Rex and i8 can be instead charged at home or in the case of the i8, not reliant on charging at all for the most part. This makes more sense and essentially prevents range anxiety. Ask any Telsa owner about it and this is probably the biggest reason why you see most of them putting around at 65mph. Its not a good feeling. I used to get it initially when I got our i3 but now, I could give a rats ass if there isn't a public charging station for me to use. I can just run off my Rex. Over time once Tesla pays and builds for the infrastructure on the backs of investors and their early adopters/owners, then BMW can move away from hybridization, but even then, I do not believe we will have the type of charging infrastructure in place to cover 100% of the USA like we do now with gasoline stations. So advanced hybrids like the i3 and i8 are IMO the way to go. We may never be fully independent of gasoline but lets just use a lot less of it so its lasts us much longer. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-21-2016, 05:10 PM | #24 | |
Colonel
1753
Rep 2,942
Posts |
Quote:
There's a major flaw in the thinking above as well: oil price behavior. Think about it, and remember what happens when: - Demand exceeds supply (the price goes way up, as it did in the mid-2000s partially because China's dependence skyrocketed because of rampant industrialization and urbanization combined with its new middle class' consumption demands), and - Supply exceeds demand (the price goes way up because supply is cut to normalize the market. Remember the Oil Glut of the late 1970s? That's exactly what happened.) In either scenario, there will be a tipping point when operating an EV will actually be significantly cheaper, in both the short term and long term, than operating a gas vehicle -- even a hybrid. That tipping point can, and will, be reached in multiple scenarios: oil running out (reducing supply), gas cars becoming more scarce (reducing demand), price fluctuations due to OPEC and other geopolitical factors, etc. The challenge for EV builders and developers now is making EVs that are as convenient to operate as a conventional ones -- or, at least, that have the capability to do as much as a combustion-powered car does. Part of closing the convenience gap is refueling -- charging capability. The viability of the EV market is limited by that -- and in this day and age (particularly in the U.S. and Asia), only a private company such as Tesla can have the foresight and resources to close that convenience gap across nations. No government has this capability, or this power. Remember that Tesla is not just working on infrastructure in the U.S. -- it is doing it across Europe, and will likely start in Asia in the next year or two. The above is why. Futurethink. Because it will need to happen, eventually -- and it's Tesla's ultimate goal to be in a position to profit from it long term.
__________________
--Life is a journey made more exciting with a fast car.--
--Helmets are for closers.-- <<Current: "Blackened" '18 NBM Porsche 718 Cayman ... Gone (but not forgotten): "Blackened" MG '15 228i M Sport w/aFe filter/scoop, Hertz drivers, P3Cars multigauge, other goodies>> |
|
Appreciate
4
|
04-21-2016, 05:24 PM | #25 | |
Brigadier General
1882
Rep 3,341
Posts |
Quote:
When a group of people leave, as in this case, it does portray bmw poorly.
__________________
Currently:
2018 GT3 2020 X3MC Previously: 1999 M3 2002 M3 2005 S4 2008 C63 2015 M3 2016 X5M 2019 911S |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-21-2016, 05:37 PM | #26 | |
Brigadier General
3836
Rep 4,672
Posts
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Quote:
Regardless of what situation BMW i is in, BMW will eventually recoup it's investment, whether it be selling more BMW i vehicles or by selling vehicles under the BMW/MINI marque using the knowledge and technology gained from BMW i. You can pretty much equate BMW i to Bugatti. The only difference, I don't think Bugatti even turns a profit. VW throws things at Bugatti and in turn hopes they can use that across the VAG while catering to the wealthy. BMW i is the exact same thing but far more obtainable to consumers. Last edited by TheBingoBalls; 04-21-2016 at 05:43 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-21-2016, 06:15 PM | #27 | |
Blocked from G80/G82 for having an opinion
3498
Rep 3,735
Posts |
Quote:
The only thing IMO that Tesla has done is popularized the idea of EVs and they have managed to sell the hype really well. If people want to drink the coolaid then that is fine with me. I truly believe the route that BMW is taking makes a lot more sense for the real world that we live in today. And you're probably right, in 10-20 years things will/may be different and the technology will be there to quick charge your car in a few mins, not a few hours, then yes, pure EVs will make more sense. But until then, BMWi's approach is the better one. Plus BMW's CFRP technology and manufacturing techniques are light years ahead of anyone in the industry, including Tesla. The true challenge of EVs is the dead weight of the battery that you have to carry around. Its a self defeating cycle. Want to go faster and farther? The only answer is a bigger battery! That doesn't make sense. They need to figure out a way to make the car lighter and more efficient. The best way to do that now is thru hybridization and CRFP. Thats where BMW i strikes a much better balance in their approach to EVs. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-21-2016, 07:26 PM | #28 |
Lieutenant Colonel
775
Rep 1,498
Posts
Drives: 2017 MB C63 S AMG Coupe
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Boston, MA
|
Guys come on. We all know the reason for the "e" models is to meet government regulations with "mpg" numbers. Nothing more, nothing less.
It's why there are so many models of the same kinds of cars, with some selling like crap but BMW keeping them around. The more models they can throw a 4-banger in, the higher the company average gets. So they can keep making cars like the m5/m6 and not worry about fuel efficiency too much. Every single customer that has bought an e car from us has expressed frustration at how the car sucks in power transition and that the battery isn't big enough to support squat, especially the one in the x5 e. But as long as they can publish the car has "55mpge" on paper, that's all that matters. The i brand will continue to grow slowly, introducing models when BMW feels fit, not when people scream for more. Not saying that BMW will not focus on making fuel efficient cars, but don't expect the first generation e cars to be anything fantastic. Trying to meet regulations is of highest priority. I'd rather them have these e models to boost overall company mpg average while still making kick ass motors for the rest of us
__________________
2017 MB C63 S Coupe - DINAN | MODAL WORKS
retired: GranTurismo MC, Giulia Quadrifoglio, B8.5 RS5, Q60 RedSport, e82 135, F80, e92 M3, e90 M3, (2) e92 335, B8 S4, C209 CLK55 AMG, e46 330 |
Appreciate
0
|
04-21-2016, 07:33 PM | #29 |
Colonel
500
Rep 2,400
Posts |
Agree, this is incredible. M division and now i-division (where all the money is invested) talent is leaving. Biermann was a lifer and lived, ate, and breathed ///M and to go to Hyundai at this juncture in his career? As I stated many times before, there is something going on at this company where they cannot retain key managers. Management turnover at this pace is just another indication of a bad fact pattern that coupled with less than inspiring vehicles demonstrates a company that may be at or near the peak of its success.
Also the excuse-fest and spin-zone word smithing only serves to further reduce BMW credibility. Many of us are not fooled and BMW should be very concerned and not take any comfort by record sales numbers. Remember Toyota? Tesla is in a very competitive position to eat BMW's breakfast, lunch, and dinner! QUOTE=Viffermike;19795744]This is now even bigger than Albert Biermann leaving BMW M for Hyundai. BMW i has now lost not just its program chief; it's lost what amounts to its entire upper brain trust. In one month. Something's not right at BMW i -- and it probably has much more to do with corporate priorities and resources than the threat of Tesla on its face. (Typical that a newspaper would overgeneralize like that, though the WSJ is better about that than most). After all, a relatively small manufacturer can only do so much ... To me, this is likely evidence that BMW has spread itself too thin.[/QUOTE] |
Appreciate
1
|
04-21-2016, 07:54 PM | #30 | |
Private
59
Rep 63
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-21-2016, 07:57 PM | #31 |
Brigadier General
651
Rep 4,321
Posts |
Working for a German company, I can tell you, this is actually worse than bad.
And they'll take 4 years to replace the talent, at which point Apple and others will be well into the mix. Competition is healthy, so eventually we'll benefit...
__________________
CURRENT: 2017 RS3 (miss you guys)
SOLD: 2012 335i Mineral Gray M Performance Exhaust/Brakes/Suspension/LSD|Bav Stage 1/AMP||ER CP/IC/DP/OC | Dinan CAI/N55 PWG BIG TURBO|BMWF30.com |
Appreciate
0
|
04-21-2016, 08:02 PM | #32 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
775
Rep 1,498
Posts
Drives: 2017 MB C63 S AMG Coupe
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Boston, MA
|
Quote:
The M boss leaving was devastating in my opinion. He led and build one of the best (if not the best) sub brands in history, BMW M. To have him leave abruptly is a telling sign that corporate BMW is getting greedy and very controlling. They're starting to strap the sub divisions and create their agendas for them instead of letting the brands fully innovate. The M boss wanted to do so much more than what he was allowed to do, and he disliked the dilution of the brand (read this in a interview in a German business insider I believe). Now BMW keeps saying that the i brand won't release another car until at least 2020. And with the failure of the i8 with the lack of creating anything special or building on it, you have the i leaders leaving. They want to innovate and grow their respective sub brands and BMW is saying no and rather create junk models further diluting the brand and "making something for everyone" Very reminiscent of GM before they crashed and went through a restructuring. Maybe that's what BMW needs.
__________________
2017 MB C63 S Coupe - DINAN | MODAL WORKS
retired: GranTurismo MC, Giulia Quadrifoglio, B8.5 RS5, Q60 RedSport, e82 135, F80, e92 M3, e90 M3, (2) e92 335, B8 S4, C209 CLK55 AMG, e46 330 |
|
Appreciate
1
|
04-21-2016, 08:23 PM | #33 |
salty cowboys fan
6232
Rep 3,435
Posts |
BS on all this "BMW i was never meant to be successful" talk. We all know they put profit before anything else today, doesn't make any sense for them to not seek ROI. I swear I remember the marketing spiel before release that i3's were going to take over cities and blah blah
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-21-2016, 08:33 PM | #34 |
Colonel
500
Rep 2,400
Posts |
Mandatory retirement age is usually for c-suite employees at the corporate/group level and is designed for succession reasons. If the rules did apply to him as the head of the division/chief engineer, then that's just a dumb rule and further evidence of a misguided and antiquated company that legislates retirement no matter how critical that person is to the success of the business.
|
Appreciate
1
|
04-21-2016, 08:39 PM | #35 | |
Brigadier General
3836
Rep 4,672
Posts
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
|
04-21-2016, 09:32 PM | #36 |
Colonel
2039
Rep 2,680
Posts |
the board needs to be replaced. they are spending funds on fwd chassis and yet can't design a proper m. they are killing passion and no wonder folks are leaving. it will take a long time to recover. they are too fragmented internally and plain greedy. it's all about unit sales. Tesla is 10 years ahead at least. Hell even GM is more interesting, can't believe I'm writing this.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-21-2016, 09:38 PM | #37 | ||
Colonel
1099
Rep 2,286
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-21-2016, 11:11 PM | #38 | |
Major General
5323
Rep 5,824
Posts |
Quote:
The i8 is far from failure it is made it to be. Its the future of the Sports Car, today.
__________________
The M850i is evidence that BMW have got their mojo back when it comes to dynamic sports cars...
|
|
Appreciate
2
|
04-21-2016, 11:14 PM | #39 | |
Major General
5323
Rep 5,824
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
The M850i is evidence that BMW have got their mojo back when it comes to dynamic sports cars...
|
|
Appreciate
2
|
04-21-2016, 11:58 PM | #40 | |
Lieutenant General
18208
Rep 11,764
Posts
Drives: 2018 M4 Comp Indv
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Newport Beach
|
Quote:
(1.) BMW is clearly taking a "middle road" strategy with electric: build a competency so if it takes off ramping up is a small pivot, if it doesn't you get all of the lightweight materials technology and the MPG benefits which gives you room for huge margin M-cars. It's not a big risk because you're not trying to build a full lineup of i-cars (unless it takes off) as TheBingoBalls points out. (2.) Biermann leaving is broadly irrelevant. Whether planned or not, it was probably a bump but the world's graveyards are full of indispensable men. (3.) BMW probably has an internal SharePoint site. Staff churn is never fun but I'm sure they have a SharePoint with all the M/i/e-plans in it. Step back from the ledge everyone, BMW is going to be ok. |
|
Appreciate
4
|
04-22-2016, 12:42 AM | #41 | |
In The Rain
8234
Rep 6,287
Posts
Drives: '24 GT4RS, '24 Macan GTS
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SoCal
|
Quote:
Suddenly the sky is falling because BMW lost 3 people lol. And by the way, if you trust some China Start-Up company, you should rethink your stance. I would never buy a car that is "Made in China" That isn't going happen in my life time. If they can barely make proper toilets I ain't buying their cars.
__________________
'24 Porsche Cayman GT4RS Arctic Grey "Alice"
'24 Porsche Macan GTS Dolomite Silver "Gina" |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-22-2016, 12:43 AM | #42 |
salty cowboys fan
6232
Rep 3,435
Posts |
No, I don't expect that. That's not at all what I said.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-22-2016, 12:55 AM | #43 | |
Blocked from G80/G82 for having an opinion
3498
Rep 3,735
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-22-2016, 12:58 AM | #44 |
Captain
177
Rep 679
Posts |
Man the Germans (and Ferrari) are in a very precarious position. What has made their brand so unique have been built around many things- but one main one- the engine is pretty much persona non grata as it pertains to the current and future EV's. I mean the Tesla P85 0-60 in a frictionless 3.2 seconds (or better?) I know straight line speed isn't the all in all but geez... So the sonorous Ferrari V8s and 12's , the BMW "inline 6" these are automtive icons of what is quickly becoming a bygone era. So they must go down this path and in a big way. If Tesla delivers on their new one to the tune of 330,000 first time out- what a game changer that is. Not that all will follow through and buy- but for 35-40k would you rather a Tesla or a KIA Optima which can get to those levels. This isnt happening tomorrow but the direction is unmistakeable- the internal combustion engines days are numbers- and the established German makers need to start adapting now and leverage their brand, handling, premium interiors (Teslas arent that nice inside actually)
and EASIER AND BETTER TO USE Infotainment centers- I am not a fan of BMWs set up for a variety of reasons, and can be improved upon A LOT. It will be interesting to see how all this unfolds- but waiting for an EV 3 series 0-60 in 3 seconds... with world class handling and lower weight with all those batteries. There are opportunities... |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|