BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Engine, Transmission, Exhaust, Drivetrain, ECU Software Modifications
 
European Auto Source (EAS)
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      03-31-2024, 11:20 AM   #3257
Scharbag
Colonel
Scharbag's Avatar
Canada
2621
Rep
2,138
Posts

Drives: 2011 E92 M3
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Victoria

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2011 BMW E92 M3  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulGros View Post
I'd say they're both relevant.

Firstly I'm struggling to see how bearings can give extra clearance when the measured and published figures put the wall thickness inline with OEM / others?

So that then raises the question on why there is an oil flow difference, particularly on an engine with a controlled pump that varies flow? As far as I am aware, the oil pressure and flow data was measured in total, not just for the bearing feed. So, if I am going to be pedantic, that then also raises the question of how you know the oil flow to the bearings was lower when only total engine flow was measured?
Flow is a function of pressure and system curve. Just like V=IR in electrical.

By changing clearance, the system curve is also changed (resistance analog). The S65 has a variable displacement oil pump with a pressure pilot. This allows the pump to maintain a target pressure as system variables change. Therefore, if "resistance" is reduced, flow must increase.

Yes - this is a single engine but a single variable was changed. Given the data, the only conclusion is that the BE bearings changed the system curve by reducing the resistance to flow. This means that the BE shells have more clearance than the 702/703 bearings that were removed from the engine.

I agree, the "proper" way to "prove" this would be to test a statistically significant number of engines. Realistically, this is impractical given the massive cost this would require. What we can do is extrapolate and infer given the results that we do have access too. If there is data that exists to contradict the existing thesis that the OE shells doe not offer proper clearance, then that needs to be considered. That said, theory and practice are often different - so given the data that is available regarding measured cranks, rods and shells, I will happily defer to practice and results rather than arguing about the theory.

Finally - why in the heck would any engine manufacturer produce an engine with a SINGLE rod shell? That puts ALL your eggs in the tolerance basket... Lame.

Cheers,
__________________

2011 E92 M3 - 6MT, ZCP, ZF LSD, ESS G1, Some other goodies...
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST