|
|
|
KEEP M3POST ALIVE BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER LINK! |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
11-26-2014, 06:36 AM | #1 |
Colonel
336
Rep 2,940
Posts |
Question on increased stagger and understeer
If you increase the stagger from the stock 245/265 to a 255/295 set-up is the increase in understeer really noticeable, or not really?
Is the added grip worth the trade-off? I don't want to go wider than 255 in front because I want to maintain steering feel, but also want to maximize rear grip without increasing understeer during more aggressive driving. Is a 255/275 set-up the best way to go?
__________________
Audi S6 * Audi S3 * Porsche Cayman GTS
--Former BMW M3 owner |
11-26-2014, 01:41 PM | #3 |
Brigadier General
569
Rep 3,742
Posts |
Good question. I would like to know others' experiences as well.
I assume that understeer/oversteer is a function of grip. The wisdom being that if you reduce front-end grip and increase rear-end grip on the E92 M3, you will increase understeer. Assuming that's the case, I found it interesting that Michelin PSS in 255/35/19 on 9" wheels actually have a bigger contact patch (narrower but much longer) than Michelin PSS in 275/30/19 on 9.5" wheels. (Michelin PSS in 295/30/19 on 10.5" wheels have a larger contact patch than 275/35/19 on 10" wheels, though.) Thus, if that data is accurate, it would seem that the overall grippiest setup (at least on Michelin PSS) would be 255/35/19 on 19 x 9" wheels up front, and 295/30/19 on 10.5" wheels in the rear. http://bndtechsource.ucoz.com/index/...alculator/0-20 |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2014, 01:43 PM | #4 |
-
11817
Rep 23,187
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2014, 08:06 AM | #7 |
Colonel
336
Rep 2,940
Posts |
Actually I am gearing up to spend more time at the track. A really nice new track is being built 20 minutes from where I live. I will be buying a club membership.
Yes, yes.....I know about understeer, stagger, etc, but that is why I am wondering if this amount of increased stagger and increased understeer is more theory or is it a real phenomenon. The GTS M3 uses a 255/285 set up so 30mm obviously works just fine. I don't care about the fastest times, etc. I am not racing for money. It is all about fun and the subjective driving experience. I am looking for the best possible combination of feel, responsiveness and grip at track speeds, as opposed to street speeds. Again...I am not looking for the set-up that will necessarily give me the fastest time, just the best subjective track experience. My top choice right now is actually to go with a 265/35/18 and 285/35/18 set-up on Apex wheels. Here is the track at Palmer Motorsports Park in Palmer, MA. Scheduled to open spring/summer of 2015: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7VmLvAVBrI
__________________
Audi S6 * Audi S3 * Porsche Cayman GTS
--Former BMW M3 owner Last edited by LarThaL; 11-27-2014 at 08:17 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2014, 08:18 AM | #8 |
Major
115
Rep 1,470
Posts |
i run 265/30 and 295/30 on the street. But that is the street. I am not doing anything ridiculous enough on the street for understeer to matter. 275/35-18 at the track.
__________________
Stoptech 380mm/355mm | PFC08 / Pagid RS-29 | Akrapovic EVO - CF tips | Benvo Tune | MS UDP | AA air filter | MCS 2-way with 700/1000lb springs | Solid bushings and adjustable links | RD front swaybar | Apex EC-7 18x10 square 275/35-18 NT01 | Turner Race Studs | GT4 Brake Cooling | GT4 Power Steering Cooling | Alekshop Oil Cooler | Performance Steering Wheel | | CF Spoiler | Varis System 1 Full CF Diffuser | Extended Paddle Shifters | Schroth Quick Fit Pro | Turner Steering Rack Stops | Vorshlag Camber Plates
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2014, 09:13 AM | #9 |
-
11817
Rep 23,187
Posts |
I've always used square set up at the track. Car from factory has less grip up front and want to reduce that tendency. Adding front camber and width of front tire is how most achieve that more neutral balance.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2014, 11:09 AM | #10 |
Brigadier General
569
Rep 3,742
Posts |
I am running 275/35-18 front and 295/35-28 rear G Force Rivals on Apex EC-7 on my track wheels. No track time with them yet, but just from playing with them on the street I'm pretty excited about their track potential.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2014, 07:38 AM | #11 |
Major General
1570
Rep 8,075
Posts
Drives: 11 E90 M3 Individual
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX
|
The only reason I run a square sized tire setup is so that I can rotate tires. What a PIA if you cord a front tire and you only have an extra rear tire.
Run a staggered set up. Stuff as much back there as you can (that's what she said). In an ideal world, I'd run 275/295.
__________________
2018 F30 320iX Melbourne Red
2011 E90 M3 Monte Carlo Blue 2004 E46 M3 Imola Red 2000 E36/7 Z3 Steel Blue |
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2014, 07:43 PM | #12 |
Major General
2759
Rep 5,484
Posts |
Don't just look at width when considering stagger. A 245/40-18 front and 285/40-18 rear, for instance, would yield a car with more steady-state cornering Understeer but more wheelspin on corner exit due to shorter tire with shorter sidewall and gearing, all else being equal. I haven't tried it yet but I think this car's happy place (because you can only run so much front tire) may be a 275 front and rear setup, with a taller rear aspect ratio
My theory is that What the car, which is somewhat pushy-loose from the factory, needs is better corner entry to apex grip (bigger front tire) and more throttle-on grip (taller rear tire) to balance that extra front grip once you start feeding in throttle. A 275/295 setup gets you part way there that's what I'm running now, but still feel now that I have all this front grip the rear starts to run out of stick when I ask it to power out of corners mostly due to overpowering the outside rear when feeding in throttle.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2014, 08:45 PM | #13 | |
Major General
1570
Rep 8,075
Posts
Drives: 11 E90 M3 Individual
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX
|
Quote:
I never thought of running a taller tire in the rear to help that. Interesting. I'd try and fit a 305 but now you are talking about some serious tire money. Screw that....I'll just drift my way around thank you very much!
__________________
2018 F30 320iX Melbourne Red
2011 E90 M3 Monte Carlo Blue 2004 E46 M3 Imola Red 2000 E36/7 Z3 Steel Blue |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2014, 11:17 PM | #14 | |
Colonel
499
Rep 2,400
Posts |
Believe the M3 GTS also runs spacers at the front and rear (with wider front spacers). This will have the effect of dialing out some understeer, so you have to look at the combination of track (offset) in addition to tire sizes.
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-30-2014, 08:20 AM | #15 |
Major General
2759
Rep 5,484
Posts |
I agree this car corners on the bumpstops in stock form frequently but I also don't think the bumpstops on this car are all that harsh a transition. Travel when you start compressing the bumpstops is still travel and the stops on this car are long and very progressive otherwise with the very soft stock spring rates (considering how heavy it is and how much grip it generates, about 1g on modern tires like the PSS) the car would ride like an anvil and be useless over bumps even when stock, and we know that's not true.
So if you're interested in staying with near stock spring rates you're going to be on the stops anyway and might as well find other ways to get the balance right I also agree sideways are the best ways
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-30-2014, 06:28 PM | #16 |
Major General
1570
Rep 8,075
Posts
Drives: 11 E90 M3 Individual
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX
|
__________________
2018 F30 320iX Melbourne Red
2011 E90 M3 Monte Carlo Blue 2004 E46 M3 Imola Red 2000 E36/7 Z3 Steel Blue |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|