Dalpocha is like a weed that keeps re-appearing but we have plenty of weed killer
M5Rick wroteNext time I'm gonna merge one of their spam posts with either this 2009 thread or this 2011 thread.Dalpocha is like a weed that keeps re-appearing but we have plenty of weed killer
Artemis wroteThat'll make his dayNext time I'm gonna merge one of their spam posts with either this 2009 thread or this 2011 thread.

M5Rick wroteLet's talk about Zombies [#155]That'll make his day
Artemis wroteThey try, but can't even string a poster name together instead jumbling up the letters, no A-Level English there
M5Rick wroteThose account names are auto-generated: spam bots - only limited human intervention.They try, but can't even string a poster name together instead jumbling up the letters, no A-Level English there
Artemis wroteSick chapsThose account names are auto-generated: spam bots - only limited human intervention.
Poor chaps, each time they check back the Sports Lounge their previous eggs are gone as a result of a few mouse-clicks.
Just saying.....cmyx6go wroteThe forced delay is annoying indeed. Yet, they might care you stayIt's a real pain in the ass that you have to wait 30 seconds between spam reports.Just saying.....
Esteban wroteLooks like they gave up a couple of days ago. I expect them to return someday.I usually get several of the Korean spammers most nights starting around 6pm my time. I’m happy to do my part to help to eliminate them from our beloved Bimmerpost.
Artemis wroteIf they do, you have us to help corral them.Looks like they gave up a couple of days ago. I expect them to return someday.
cmyx6go wroteAnd what about this?I think this has been a great tool allowing us to help the fight against spam, but I have seen 3 long time members posts/threads erroneously marked as spam in the past week. I'm honestly not sure if these were mistakes or someone screwing around. In one case, the subject line of the thread easily could have been misinterpreted as spam but I have no idea why the others were flagged.
Please look at the members post count and join date before flagging as spam.
Shouldn't spams be identified by the message content (subject line included)? Also, reporting should be a way to attract a moderator's attention only and voting is your chance to disagree (and save a spammer you fail to recognize
). I recall 
cmyx6go wroteBad idea, because as you pointed out there are long-silent members with lots of legitimate posts that have had their old accounts hijacked and used by spammers.Please look at the members post count and join date before flagging as spam.
vreihen16 wroteAnd me!My suggestion that all of the Universal Forums (high value for SEO spam because of all the different web URLs for the same message content) require a user to login would stop a lot of the SEO spam, since the posts would not be visible to search engines.....
vreihen16 wroteI'm not saying that the join date and post counts should be the only thing you look at, it should be taken into consideration. The majority of spam I see are the new users with no posts. With the exception of Nazali's thread that had the title in Klingon, I have no idea why the recent threads were marked as spam, the message content was fine. Like I said, not sure if it was a mistake or someone screwing around.Bad idea, because as you pointed out there are long-silent members with lots of legitimate posts that have had their old accounts hijacked and used by spammers.
The crowd-sourced voting system seems to be the best compromise.
My suggestion that all of the Universal Forums (high value for SEO spam because of all the different web URLs for the same message content) require a user to login would stop a lot of the SEO spam, since the posts would not be visible to search engines.....
vreihen16 wroteBad idea, because as you pointed out there are long-silent members with lots of legitimate posts that have had their old accounts hijacked and used by spammers.
The crowd-sourced voting system seems to be the best compromise.
My suggestion that all of the Universal Forums (high value for SEO spam because of all the different web URLs for the same message content) require a user to login would stop a lot of the SEO spam, since the posts would not be visible to search engines.....
cmyx6go wroteThis was one of the threads marked as spam.I'm not saying that the join date and post counts should be the only thing you look at, it should be taken into consideration. The majority of spam I see are the new users with no posts. With the exception of Nazali's thread that had the title in Klingon, I have no idea why the recent threads were marked as spam, the message content was fine. Like I said, not sure if it was a mistake or someone screwing around.
No one wroteIt's the report time. The last who votes is a fool!you have a spammer in OT: https://f20.1addicts.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2098055.