7.8MVIEWS
3.3KREPLIES
19.1KAPPRECIATES
2 d agoLAST POST
...
Attached image
////
Attached image
Lady Jane wrote
1965 Marcos.


Attached image
The reg indicates 1969.
Atavus wrote
The reg indicates 1969.
The picture and info came from Autocar.uk. :)
Steeler wrote
Love the 60's and early 70's Marcos'
Surprising small cars in real life.

Wooden marine plywood monocoque with steel subframes for engine and rear suspension, up until late 60's.
From then on they got a full tubular chassis..
My Bil has owned a Marcos (Ford 2.5 V6) for over 35-years. His is the same registration period (G), as the picture posted above.
Atavus wrote
The reg indicates 1969.
Yes that's right. Bil's Marcos is late 69 on G plate.
.
Attached image
nm
Attached image
1979 ac 3000 ME



Attached image
Lady Jane wrote
Some guys like a wide caboose. :)
I need a Hug
Lady Jane wrote
Some guys like a wide caboose. :)
It has to be fit and functional, like that M4.
🤯
Attached image
You don't see this every day!

Image hosted on: live.staticflickr.com

Image hosted on: live.staticflickr.com

Image hosted on: live.staticflickr.com
Patrick303 wrote
You don't see this every day!
Why?

Why would the dealer buy it?

Why would anyone buy it for that price?
Fly320s wrote
Why?

Why would the dealer buy it?

Why would anyone buy it for that price?
great cars but Definitely not worth that much
1961 Tornado Talisman.


Attached image
M_Six wrote
I miss my Z4.
My dad had 3 frist gens '04, '06, & '08 and he has a 2010 now. Such good cars, that first gen was a blast to drive.
representin' for them gangstas all across the world
Attached image
F87M2. wrote
great cars but Definitely not worth that much
I guess time will tell. If someone is willing to pay that then I guess that's what it's worth. Too Rich for my blood though.