RedScytheM3 wroteFirst line says engine blew due to bearings.Does this qualify to be posted here?
.
RedScytheM3 wroteFirst line says engine blew due to bearings.Does this qualify to be posted here?
aus wroteNot sure we're referring to the same thing.RedScytheM3 wroteFirst line says engine blew due to bearings.Does this qualify to be posted here?
.
TheRussski wroteOk, if you go back and read the thread Russski put up (which still does not qualify to be posted here), you won't see anything about an engine blown. The guy needed new TAs... and as far as that thread reveals, his car is fine now.
RedScytheM3 wroteFrom the third sentence of that thread - "Car currently has 116k miles but engine was replaced under warranty (rod issue) at roughly 50-60k."Not sure we're referring to the same thing.
Ok, if you go back and read the thread Russski put up (which still does not qualify to be posted here), you won't see anything about an engine blown. The guy needed new TAs... and as far as that thread reveals, his car is fine now.
Russski, do you think a motor that experienced a failed TA that was eventually replaced is a blown motor?
Bartledoo wroteI see. Thanks for the clarification.RedScytheM3 wroteFrom the third sentence of that thread - "Car currently has 116k miles but engine was replaced under warranty (rod issue) at roughly 50-60k."Not sure we're referring to the same thing.
Ok, if you go back and read the thread Russski put up (which still does not qualify to be posted here), you won't see anything about an engine blown. The guy needed new TAs... and as far as that thread reveals, his car is fine now.
Russski, do you think a motor that experienced a failed TA that was eventually replaced is a blown motor?
We haven't seen any other rod issues causing engine failure, so it was probably bearing failure.

RedScytheM3 wroteI see. Thanks for the clarification.
pbonsalb wroteYeah agreed, was posting as another RB engine implosionNo thanks. $11,500 plus $10,000 for a used engine and some of your time more of your money to change the rod bearings in the new used motor and to do the engine swap? I could buy a good running M3 with fewer miles for less.
wfdeacon88 wroteUnfortunately, that listing has expired.was snooping around CL in NC for some parts and found this..
https://raleigh.craigslist.org/cto/d/smithfield-2008-bmw-m/6853653213.html
MorganM wrotePost them here.Here's pics of my old Rod Bearings. 2011 with 40000 miles roughly.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/y6WKzveriJr5zKiR8



deansbimmer wroteAnything we should worry about with the mains after replacing with BE rb's? Or just ignore this and try to not stress as it's purely a bmw lottery..?A couple of failures this week.
Rod and main failure. Engine locked up with no warning according to customer. Crankshaft and Engine block were damaged beyond repair. We replaced his engine
Rod bearing failure. This had very minor rod knock that another local shop tried to fix by replacing the bearings with OEM bearings and bolts stating the journals looked fine. After that work the slight knock persisted around 3k rpm so the owner brought it to us. #1 rod bearing spun within 200 miles of being replaced. Aside from that very slight knock at 3k there were no other symptoms of failure.
wfdeacon88 wroteYou can worry about your mains too! But to fix them is close to the cost of a new motor so its almost not worth fixing unless you have access to free labor. Most of us have decided to just roll the dice as the # of failures on mains are far lower and therefore more easy to stomach than on RBs.Anything we should worry about with the mains after replacing with BE rb's? Or just ignore this and try to not stress as it's purely a bmw lottery..?