pz619 wroteAnd stopping/destroying data centersFlock hatred might be what unites the world. I never heard from anyone in the general public that is fine with this. Across all spectrums.
30.1KVIEWS
124REPLIES
324APPRECIATES
24 min agoLAST POST
JABCAT wroteThank you for posting this. For people who claim racism isn't a big problem anymore, the evidence like this is all around us. I've seen it not just in neighbors but in the LEOs I've worked with.Yes to your question (cafes, grocery store, etc.) There are also town social media pages/groups, neighborhood groups, etc., and every time something happens it's always blamed on people of color by the "melanin-deficient" i.e., white majority. Our area is all over the news for the recent & constant anti-Indian, anti-Muslim & anti-Hispanic vitriol. They don't try to hide it.
In my neighbood specifically, my next door neighbor came out - in his border patrol or whatever uniform & started harassing Hispanic workers I had remodeling my home. I had to go out there and tell him to get the F off my property. They've also called the police on another neighbor who was having his trees trimmed by, you guessed it, Hispanic landscapers.
There's also a concerted effort to not sell homes in my neighborhood to people of color. One neighbor took their home off the market because they said the only offers they got were from Indian families. The house has been sitting empty for 2 years now. They'd rather keep paying a mortgage on a 4,000 sq ft house, than sell to a non-white family. Not kidding.
There was a recent heroin ring busted. Immediately in all these online groups it was "I bet it's those trailers or aprtments over by the train tracks, we need to bulldoze them & get those people out of our town". Yeah turns out it was the rich white kids in the million $ neighborhood.
By cult I mean all the botoxed, lip-injected stay-at-home wives driving their white Escalades who act as if they need to protect the town from any "outsiders".
There are more counseling offices & child/adolescent counselors in a 4 sq. mi radius in this town than I've seen anywhere I've ever lived. That should tell you something.
But it's worse than that. Because these days it's not just denial of the racism that so clearly exists. In many quarters there is now an embrace of it. It's open, not hidden. It's extolled.
It's another example of why character matters in our leaders. The Rule of Law, which means honoring the inherent rights of all humans as set forth in the Declaration of Independence, is essential. But it's not always enough to overcome the deep character flaws of those in positions of power.
Government officials take an oath to the Constitution, not to a person or office. Yet today, most people in positions of power do the opposite. And the character of the person to whom they're providing such loyalty corrupts their actions, the Constitution and the culture at large.
Which is why we're seeing ever more of this kind of crap. We desperately need a change in who leads us.
L o l
Reeeeee!
Reeeeee!
^ We get it. You're one of the people who doesn't care that racism is absolutely contrary to the very idea this country was founded on. And absolutely contrary to the Constitution that is supposed to protect our rights from abuses by the government.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
That's All. Not just Americans. Not just white people. Not just citizens. All people.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
That's All. Not just Americans. Not just white people. Not just citizens. All people.
Saw this on the interwebs today:
Cops Used Flock to Track a Man Across State Lines to Create Pretext to Search His Car for Weed
https://www.404media.co/cops-used-flock-to-track-a-man-across-state-lines-to-create-pretext-to-search-his-car-for-weed/
Police in Wisconsin used Flock to determine that a man “travels to Michigan frequently,” where marijuana is legal, then back to Wisconsin, where it is illegal. They then used his travel across state lines as tracked by Flock as part of the probable cause justification to search his car for weed; he was eventually arrested on marijuana possession charges
Cops Used Flock to Track a Man Across State Lines to Create Pretext to Search His Car for Weed
https://www.404media.co/cops-used-flock-to-track-a-man-across-state-lines-to-create-pretext-to-search-his-car-for-weed/
Police in Wisconsin used Flock to determine that a man “travels to Michigan frequently,” where marijuana is legal, then back to Wisconsin, where it is illegal. They then used his travel across state lines as tracked by Flock as part of the probable cause justification to search his car for weed; he was eventually arrested on marijuana possession charges
Don't put words in my mouth so as to appease your mindset.
Thanks.
The atomic hypocrisy just tickled me.
Thanks.
The atomic hypocrisy just tickled me.
gonzo wroteThe atomic hypocrisy just tickled me.Don't put words in my mouth so as to appease your mindset.
Thanks.
If it helps, the last crew certainly engaged in their own abuses. As did various admins before them.
I mean, it's farcical to equate those past crimes to what's happening now. The scale is drastically worse. But yeah, no one is clean.
The struggle to protect people’s inherent rights — whether or not you like them or agree with them — is never ending. It’s just a much bigger struggle these days because the corruption and lies and abuses of power are so much worse. It’s day after day of stuff we’ve never seen before.
These types of reports are common lately:
5 Georgia officers fired, arrested for misusing access to city's Flock cameras, GBI sayshttps://www.cbsnews.com/atlanta/news/5-georgia-officers-fired-arrested-for-misusing-access-to-citys-flock-cameras-gbi-says/
I was just at a dinner party and I ask if the Flock Cameras bother them and all 6 present didn't even know what they were and after I described them, they all nad no problem with the police using them.
Nothing to see here, just move along.
5 Georgia officers fired, arrested for misusing access to city's Flock cameras, GBI sayshttps://www.cbsnews.com/atlanta/news/5-georgia-officers-fired-arrested-for-misusing-access-to-citys-flock-cameras-gbi-says/
I was just at a dinner party and I ask if the Flock Cameras bother them and all 6 present didn't even know what they were and after I described them, they all nad no problem with the police using them.

Nothing to see here, just move along.
Nailed it.
Lets not get distracted, this is not a political party and who's in office now debate.
This is a do you believe in freedom or so you believe it's ok to give up freedom so someone can make billions from your data and allow creeps and assholes use of a device to spy on you for their nefarious purposes issue. In the name of "security".
Get your political affiliation off my lawn. How ridiculous. Are you American or not? Don't let big brother own you.
This is a do you believe in freedom or so you believe it's ok to give up freedom so someone can make billions from your data and allow creeps and assholes use of a device to spy on you for their nefarious purposes issue. In the name of "security".
Get your political affiliation off my lawn. How ridiculous. Are you American or not? Don't let big brother own you.
Do Flock cameras violate the 4th Amendment? Here's what federal courts have ruled | NBC Connecticut
The Fourth Amendment protects individuals against unreasonable government searches and seizures of their persons, homes, papers, and effects, and establishes requirements for warrants based on probable cause.
Just for reference:
The Fourth Amendment protects individuals against unreasonable government searches and seizures of their persons, homes, papers, and effects, and establishes requirements for warrants based on probable cause.
They violate the 4th amendment immediately when a specific warrant isn't in place to obtain the data and use it for a specific purpose on a specific subject. The warrant has to be issued by a judge before the evidence can be gathered and used.
Technically, operating them probably isn't a direct violation there. It's use. The question is whether flock cameras are illegally gathering the evidence. And if it is gathered by the end user improperly without a warrant, well then it's inadmissible. And the warrant requires probable cause in the first place.
So if we're using the cameras to establish probable cause to get the warrant to use the data in the first place, we have a problem.
Sad to say that a court even needs to be involved. This is fundamental to American Liberty.
Technically, operating them probably isn't a direct violation there. It's use. The question is whether flock cameras are illegally gathering the evidence. And if it is gathered by the end user improperly without a warrant, well then it's inadmissible. And the warrant requires probable cause in the first place.
So if we're using the cameras to establish probable cause to get the warrant to use the data in the first place, we have a problem.
Sad to say that a court even needs to be involved. This is fundamental to American Liberty.
What a flocking mess this could easily become. My take is this: If they are strictly limited to using such surveillance for ONLY already active felony cases like tracking a kidnapping, hunting down a known fugitive & and heinous crimes then I’m not totally against it. However, the line drawn is very important and such footage may NEVER be used to collect evidence, track people just because, traffic enforcement, etc. Any such footage would NOT be admissible in any court case, ever.
I hope this makes sense and I’m saying it right. For example, if there is an amber alert for a missing child and they have a strong lead, if the camera footage is used to track a suspects vehicle through a certain town then that to me is actually OK. If a prison escape occurs and they are using the footage to track the escapees then that’s another ok use. But those are rare and very specific. I also get that managing and ensuring the footage doesn’t get abused is going to be hard and maybe impossible.
Overall, I’d still rather there not be cameras everywhere though. I don’t even like people having them all around their houses now, pointing at everything. Everyone thinks they’re Tony Montana….
I hope this makes sense and I’m saying it right. For example, if there is an amber alert for a missing child and they have a strong lead, if the camera footage is used to track a suspects vehicle through a certain town then that to me is actually OK. If a prison escape occurs and they are using the footage to track the escapees then that’s another ok use. But those are rare and very specific. I also get that managing and ensuring the footage doesn’t get abused is going to be hard and maybe impossible.
Overall, I’d still rather there not be cameras everywhere though. I don’t even like people having them all around their houses now, pointing at everything. Everyone thinks they’re Tony Montana….
The 4th amendment has always been open to interpretation. Remember the "probable cause" vs "reasonable suspicion" searches on traffic stops? I accept that on public roadways we yield some of our right to privacy but only to a point. Tracking seems way out of bounds, also these camera's are often not located on road and parking lots but in residential neighborhoods, college campus's and business locations. I also don't think this has as much to do with tracking cars as it has to do with "crime prevention". This becomes a clear case of camel's nose under the tent.
So easy to sell this surveillance to town councils, college administrators, police departments, ect.
Stops crime
reduces high speed chases
recover stolen vehicles
reduces work load on police departments
higher conviction rates
But IMO the cost is too high.
The greater the power, the more dangerous the abuse.
Edmund Burke
So easy to sell this surveillance to town councils, college administrators, police departments, ect.
Stops crime
reduces high speed chases
recover stolen vehicles
reduces work load on police departments
higher conviction rates
But IMO the cost is too high.
The greater the power, the more dangerous the abuse.
Edmund Burke
Mikey240 wroteYou're describing a tightly regulated government owned system operated only when ordered and which otherwise remains OFF. Like a drone pilot.What a flocking mess this could easily become. .
Overall, I’d still rather there not be cameras everywhere though. I don’t even like people having them all around their houses now, pointing at everything. Everyone thinks they’re Tony Montana….
Sounds great, passes the bill of rights sniff test.
FWIW there have been issues for decades with this kind of thing. Closed circuit security cameras and the footage they record. Same thing, but infinitely larger scale.
Things that make you go Hmmmm
Cops Are Being Told To Hide License Plate Readers From Drivers And Reports
August 7, 2026
"A Wapello County Sheriff’s Office policy obtained by 404 Media states: “DO NOT MENTION ALPR USAGE TO THE OCCUPANTS OF THE VEHICLE” and “DO NOT MENTION ALPR USAGE IN YOUR REPORT OR COMPLAINT UNLESS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY.”
https://www.carscoops.com/2026/08/flock-alpr-police-secrecy/
Cops Are Being Told To Hide License Plate Readers From Drivers And Reports
August 7, 2026
"A Wapello County Sheriff’s Office policy obtained by 404 Media states: “DO NOT MENTION ALPR USAGE TO THE OCCUPANTS OF THE VEHICLE” and “DO NOT MENTION ALPR USAGE IN YOUR REPORT OR COMPLAINT UNLESS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY.”
https://www.carscoops.com/2026/08/flock-alpr-police-secrecy/
ShocknAwe wroteI get it. Its still very suspect and lends itself to be abused even with strict mitigation procedures in placeYou're describing a tightly regulated government owned system operated only when ordered and which otherwise remains OFF. Like a drone pilot.
Sounds great, passes the bill of rights sniff test.
FWIW there have been issues for decades with this kind of thing. Closed circuit security cameras and the footage they record. Same thing, but infinitely larger scale.
Car-Addicted wroteTracking is way out of bounds. At that point its just a big brother thing. Then, they'll want cameras installed in your home too to make sure you didnt throw out a tiny box that could have been recycled or shit like that.The 4th amendment has always been open to interpretation. Remember the "probable cause" vs "reasonable suspicion" searches on traffic stops? I accept that on public roadways we yield some of our right to privacy but only to a point. Tracking seems way out of bounds, also these camera's are often not located on road and parking lots but in residential neighborhoods, college campus's and business locations. I also don't think this has as much to do with tracking cars as it has to do with "crime prevention". This becomes a clear case of camel's nose under the tent.
So easy to sell this surveillance to town councils, college administrators, police departments, ect.
Stops crime
reduces high speed chases
recover stolen vehicles
reduces work load on police departments
higher conviction rates
But IMO the cost is too high.
The greater the power, the more dangerous the abuse.
Edmund Burke
.Agree on the public roads thing and I want the roads to be safe as much as possible. But not at the expense of violating amendments and intrusive surveillance. Like I said, if this stuff were used as a legit tool for very specific & high profile cases I might be OK with it. But as the other guy replied back to me, thats a cherry-picked solution that does sound great until its not.
Car-Addicted wroteThings that make you go Hmmmm
Cops Are Being Told To Hide License Plate Readers From Drivers And Reports
August 7, 2026
"A Wapello County Sheriff’s Office policy obtained by 404 Media states: “DO NOT MENTION ALPR USAGE TO THE OCCUPANTS OF THE VEHICLE” and “DO NOT MENTION ALPR USAGE IN YOUR REPORT OR COMPLAINT UNLESS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY.”
https://www.carscoops.com/2026/08/flock-alpr-police-secrecy/
ShocknAwe wroteIf only that was true of Flock...You're describing a tightly regulated government owned system operated only when ordered and which otherwise remains OFF. Like a drone pilot.
Privately owned
Largely unregulated
Frequently abused
4 Phrases to Use Whenever You’re Pulled Over by the Police:
-Am I free to go?
-I want to remain silent.
-I do not consent to any searches.
-I want a lawyer.
https://www.mochellaw.com/criminal-defense/2021/4-phrases-to-use-whenever-youre-pulled-over-by-the-police/
Also:
-Am I free to go?
-I want to remain silent.
-I do not consent to any searches.
-I want a lawyer.
https://www.mochellaw.com/criminal-defense/2021/4-phrases-to-use-whenever-youre-pulled-over-by-the-police/
Also:
A True classic
This just keeps getting worse:
BLACKROCK IS QUIETLY TURNING STREET LIGHTS INTO SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS
While everyone was focused on tearing down Flock cameras, a much bigger player was already rolling out the replacement. Axon, one of the hottest companies in the surveillance market, is now partnering to turn regular street lights into smart cameras. No new poles needed. They just convert the lights you already drive under every day into: • License plate readers • Live streaming cameras • AI that recognizes vehicle make, model, color, damage, bumper stickers, and more Counties are canceling Flock contracts and spending tens of millions on Axon systems instead. Here’s the part most people don’t know: About 25% of Axon is owned by BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street. The same firms that have openly talked about “forcing behaviors.” Axon’s CEO has said their goal is to build a society where crime “just doesn’t make sense anymore” through constant monitoring. He also made $164 million in a single year. While people were busy removing Flock cameras, this more advanced, harder-to-detect system was already being installed in plain sight. Street lights → cameras. BlackRock ownership. AI vehicle tracking. Stealth rollout. Is this just “public safety”… or the next phase of the surveillance grid?
BLACKROCK IS QUIETLY TURNING STREET LIGHTS INTO SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS
While everyone was focused on tearing down Flock cameras, a much bigger player was already rolling out the replacement. Axon, one of the hottest companies in the surveillance market, is now partnering to turn regular street lights into smart cameras. No new poles needed. They just convert the lights you already drive under every day into: • License plate readers • Live streaming cameras • AI that recognizes vehicle make, model, color, damage, bumper stickers, and more Counties are canceling Flock contracts and spending tens of millions on Axon systems instead. Here’s the part most people don’t know: About 25% of Axon is owned by BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street. The same firms that have openly talked about “forcing behaviors.” Axon’s CEO has said their goal is to build a society where crime “just doesn’t make sense anymore” through constant monitoring. He also made $164 million in a single year. While people were busy removing Flock cameras, this more advanced, harder-to-detect system was already being installed in plain sight. Street lights → cameras. BlackRock ownership. AI vehicle tracking. Stealth rollout. Is this just “public safety”… or the next phase of the surveillance grid?
Car-Addicted wroteWow. Like this isn’t cool. Forcing behavior? What behavior is that exactly? What I’d find hard to believe is that any politician, even if getting kickbacks could ever be on board with this. I mean, they have families, extended families, friends, etc. too, right?This just keeps getting worse:
BLACKROCK IS QUIETLY TURNING STREET LIGHTS INTO SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS
While everyone was focused on tearing down Flock cameras, a much bigger player was already rolling out the replacement. Axon, one of the hottest companies in the surveillance market, is now partnering to turn regular street lights into smart cameras. No new poles needed. They just convert the lights you already drive under every day into: • License plate readers • Live streaming cameras • AI that recognizes vehicle make, model, color, damage, bumper stickers, and more Counties are canceling Flock contracts and spending tens of millions on Axon systems instead. Here’s the part most people don’t know: About 25% of Axon is owned by BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street. The same firms that have openly talked about “forcing behaviors.” Axon’s CEO has said their goal is to build a society where crime “just doesn’t make sense anymore” through constant monitoring. He also made $164 million in a single year. While people were busy removing Flock cameras, this more advanced, harder-to-detect system was already being installed in plain sight. Street lights → cameras. BlackRock ownership. AI vehicle tracking. Stealth rollout. Is this just “public safety”… or the next phase of the surveillance grid?

More importantly, what moron would vote for such a person even if they did agree with some or most of their other political positions?