237.2KVIEWS
249REPLIES
23APPRECIATES
07-28-2025LAST POST
Car54 wrote
Why do you just adjust one side? Doesn't your center steer go off?
It goes off so slightly that its hardly even noticeable. It's just much simpler to do one side, doing both sides just adds more complication. Yes, I want it totally straight for my DD but this is fine for the track.

Now, a much larger toe swing than we're doing would be a whole different thing...
im at -2.53 front and neutral toe and -1.92 rear with slight toe in.
I like

-1 to -2 Front

-1 Rear
not enough.
-4.4 front and-3.0 rear (E46 M3)
-2.6 front and-2.0 rear (E92 M3)
what is max at the rear on e9x?
I'm at 2.5 fr and factory spec for rear camber. Loved it! Although the rears on the outside edge took a beating.
LiM3y wrote
These sheets are from when I knocked the alignment out on the stock set up. The original dealer aligned me to 335 specs, which are different. Another dealer faxed me the specs shown on this sheet. When I had the Eibachs added, the new specs lined up with these specs limits - they didn't even comment that the car had been dropped a little. The car has been aligned twice since the install - once immediately afterwards, and again after I hit a kerb hard during a track day and knocked the alignment out slightly enough to be irritating. I don't have the before/after spec sheet any more
I had Eibach Pro-Kit for E93 M3 and they did the factory spec, however it wear out my front tire in side pretty fast, does your do the same thing? or you have different kits then me?
xccess wrote
I had Eibach Pro-Kit for E93 M3 and they did the factory spec, however it wear out my front tire in side pretty fast, does your do the same thing? or you have different kits then me?
factory spec should wear out the outside edge faster if you ever turn.:D
I was advised to keep rear camber within ~0.5 degrees of front to keep it balanced, hence -2.6 Fr and -2.0 R for me, which was about all we could get in the rear.
Love this thread
bigjae1976 wrote
I'm at 2.5 fr and factory spec for rear camber. Loved it! Although the rears on the outside edge took a beating.
was thinking of going more front and rear. any suggestions. most street driving involves getting to and from the track. was thinking 3ish front and 2.2-2.3 rear? sound reasonable?
xccess wrote
I had Eibach Pro-Kit for E93 M3 and they did the factory spec, however it wear out my front tire in side pretty fast, does your do the same thing? or you have different kits then me?
I run Conti DW tires (265/35/18 fr, 285/35/18 r) on the street, so the rate of wear is less noticeable, with rears wearing about twice as fast as the fronts. On the track (275/35/18 sq), the outside of my fronts is getting wrecked. I am having camber plates installed for next season
Before: 2011 E92 M3 with GC camber plates--
llis wrote
Camber:
Front: -3º left, -3.1º right
Rear: -1.9º left, -1.9º right

Toe:
Front: .12º left, .11º right
Rear: .11º left, .14º right
Now: 2013 E92 M3 OEM, with pins pulled--

Camber
Front: -1.42º left, -1.49º right
Rear: -1.65º left, -1.70º right

Toe
Front 0.02º left, 0.02º right
Rear: 0.06º left, 0.06º right

I wish I knew what was different in the rear of the 2013 to account for 0.2º of difference. Both cars were maxed in the rear.
Just dropped off my stock E90 ZCP and I'm eating lunch while Speedware Motorsports gets to work. Sounds like with pins out they're getting -1.2 to -1.6 front typically. I'll update when done.
Transfer wrote
Just dropped off my stock E90 ZCP and I'm eating lunch while Speedware Motorsports gets to work. Sounds like with pins out they're getting -1.2 to -1.6 front typically. I'll update when done.
Doing that after your track day? I bet your fronts look like hell. I know mine did and I had Speedware do this before, LOL.
urBan_dK wrote
Doing that after your track day? I bet your fronts look like hell. I know mine did and I had Speedware do this before, LOL.
Well as you know I'm the second owner and it turns out the prior owner already had pins pulled and camber maxed. Speedware cleaned up my toe but really they didn't have to do much to the camber.

Front
Camber -1.5 L/R
Toe 0 L/R
Caster 7.17/7.31 L/R

Rear
Camber -1.8 L/R
Toe 0.09 L/R


I was wondering how my outside shoulders didn't get destroyed at my first track day at that explains it. That and I'm just so smooth :lol:. I'll be at Pacific Raceways this sunday if you want to come out!
I had a Ohlins TTX on my set up right now.
Here is a alignment
Attached image
Went from

Front
Camber -2.2
Toe 0

Rear
Camber -1.8
Toe in .20

To the following. It drives much better on the freeway but it took a lot life out of the cornering.
grussell wrote
Went from

Front
Camber -2.2
Toe 0

Rear
Camber -1.8
Toe in .20

To the following. It drives much better on the freeway but it took a lot life out of the cornering.
Nothing matches.
Thread referenced by xcharlesy in Alignment Settings? with KW S/O Kit 04-30-2013
Just got my KW sleeves put on - im at 3/4's of the way down, believe that equates to 1.5" drop in the front and 1" in the rear.

Here are my post alignment specs - what do you guys think?
Attached image
Stock ZCP Suspension with CG Camber Plates:

Camber, Front Left, Front Right: -2.3
Toe, Front Left, Front Right: 0

Camber, Rear Left, Rear Right: -1.6
Toe, Rear Left, Rear Right: 3/32 in

I also have stock ZCP wheels with 255 35 19 F and 275 35 19 R Michelin PSS with MS 15mm spacers F and 10mm spacers R.